[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#322153: marked as done (Debian-installation reports)



Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:15:02 +0200
with message-id <200508091415.03209.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#322153: Debian-installation reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 11:34:33 +0000
>From mslonik@poczta.onet.pl Tue Aug 09 04:34:33 2005
Return-path: <mslonik@poczta.onet.pl>
Received: from smtp1.poczta.onet.pl [213.180.130.31] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E2SNN-0005LM-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:34:33 -0700
Received: from rc130.internetdsl.tpnet.pl ([80.55.54.130]:51746 "EHLO
	[192.168.0.31]") by ps1.test.onet.pl with ESMTP id <S1288615AbVHILdu> convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable;
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:33:50 +0200
Message-ID: <[🔎] 42F894A8.4040506@poczta.onet.pl>
Disposition-Notification-To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Maciej_S=B3ojewski?=
 <mslonik@poczta.onet.pl>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:34:00 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Maciej_S=B3ojewski?= <mslonik@poczta.onet.pl>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Debian-installation reports
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 r0a "Sarge" - Official=20
386 Binary-1, 2005-08-04,=20
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/
uname -a: Linux gucek 2.6.8-2-386 #1 Thu May 19 17:40:50 JST 2005 i686=20
GNU/Linux
Date: 2005-08-09
Method: netinst with option "linux26"

Machine: home-made komputer, based on Asus P2B (440BX) motherboard
Processor: i686 Celeron (III) 950 MHz
Memory: 384 MB
Root Device: connected to CSA-649U Ultra IDE Controller BIOS Version 1.=
9.10
Root Size/partition table (I didn't know which command to use, so I use=
d=20
"df"):
System plik=F3w      bl.  1K B        u=BFyte dost=EApne             %u=
=BF.=20
zamont. na
/dev/hdh3              4806936       1874344       2688404  42%      /
tmpfs                   193500             0                193500    =20
0%       /dev/shm
/dev/hdh1             2047904        435328        1612576    22%   =20
/mnt/hdh1
/dev/hdh4              933393          9056            874536    =20
2%      /home
/dev/hde1              7496              6397            699          =20
91%    /boot
/dev/hde2              7169488       5257200       1912288   74%   =20
/mnt/hde2
/dev/hde3              8217244       3967444       4249800   49%   =20
/mnt/hde3
/dev/hde5             13898664      10282616     3616048   74%    /mnt/=
hde5
/dev/hde6             29288192      19696992     9591200   68%    /mnt/=
hde6
tmpfs                    10240             780              9460       =
 =20
8%      /dev =20

Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host=20
bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP=20
bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:04.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
0000:00:04.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01=
)
0000:00:04.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 0=
1)
0000:00:04.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
0000:00:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1370 [AudioPCI]
0000:00:0a.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD=20
Technology Inc) PCI0649 (rev 02)
0000:00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M=20
[Tornado] (rev 6c)
0000:00:0c.0 Multimedia video controller: Conexant Winfast TV2000 XP=20
(rev 03)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18=20
[GeForce4 MX 4000 AGP 8x] (rev c1)

0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 02)
0000:00:04.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
0000:00:04.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
0000:00:04.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
0000:00:04.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
0000:00:09.0 0401: 1274:5000
0000:00:0a.0 0104: 1095:0649 (rev 02)
0000:00:0b.0 0200: 10b7:9200 (rev 6c)
0000:00:0c.0 0400: 14f1:8800 (rev 03)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 10de:0185 (rev c1)

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try =
it

Initial boot worked:          [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:               [O]
Detect CD:                      [O]
Load installer modules:     [O]
Detect hard drives:           [O]
Partition hard drives:         [O]
Create file systems:           [O]
Mount partitions:              [O]
Install base system:           [O]
Install boot loader:            [O]
Reboot:                            [O]

Comments/Problems:
This time everything was fine, thanks to help of Lennart Sorensen=20
<lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> who suggested to try installation option=
=20
"linux26". In my opinion "linux26" should be a default option of=20
installing netinst Sarge Debian, but I am just a newbie in Linux.=20
=46ormerly I had a problem with my CSA-649U controller in 2.4 kernel -=20
installation was not successful what was reported as Bug #321454. So th=
e=20
problem was sold in 2.6 kernel. Thanks a lot!

Best regards,
Maciej S=B3ojewski


--=20
S=B3u=BFbowy stacjonarny: +48 (58) 555-77-30 (8:00 - 16:00)
S=B3u=BFbowy kom=F3ra: +48 601 403 775
Prywatny kom=F3ra: +48 609 571 748 (Plus GSM)
Tlen: mslonik@tlen.pl
GG: 3321025
Skype: maciej_slojewski


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322153-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 12:14:37 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Tue Aug 09 05:14:37 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-out1.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.176] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E2T09-0008WN-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:14:37 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
	by smtp-out1.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
	id 1E2T08-0003wg-Mb; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:14:36 +0200
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Maciej =?iso-8859-2?q?S=B3ojewski?= <mslonik@poczta.onet.pl>,
 322153-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#322153: Debian-installation reports
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:15:02 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <[🔎] 42F894A8.4040506@poczta.onet.pl>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 42F894A8.4040506@poczta.onet.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200508091415.03209.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 322153-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

On Tuesday 09 August 2005 13:34, Maciej S=B3ojewski wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> This time everything was fine, thanks to help of Lennart Sorensen
> <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> who suggested to try installation option
> "linux26". In my opinion "linux26" should be a default option of
> installing netinst Sarge Debian, but I am just a newbie in Linux.
> Formerly I had a problem with my CSA-649U controller in 2.4 kernel -
> installation was not successful what was reported as Bug #321454. So
> the problem was sold in 2.6 kernel. Thanks a lot!

Thanks for letting us know. We are currently working on new versions of=20
the installer for Etch which have the 2.6.12 kernel and use that kernel=20
by default (witch the 2.4 kernel as option).

I'm closing both your reports as the installation was now successful.

Cheers,
=46JP



Reply to: