[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sources vs udeb mismatch in sarge



Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> For e2fsprogs and cdebconf, unless somehow the sid versions are
> suiteable for sarge, there will need to come a testing-proposed-updates
> rebuild-only upload to get the udeb's back, so that this time they *can*
> be put in sarge.

Ok.. just uploaded cdebconf 0.74.1. It does also inlcude a couple
thousand lines of translation updates which are present in the sarge
branch in svn.

> Are there otherwise issues with any of those 9 source packages w.r.t.
> udeb's getting synced to what already happened due to the source
> packages being let into sarge? If so, those will need to be fixed.

> - dhcp3:                            3.0.1-1 | 3.0.1-2

Udeb not actually used AFAIK, nor is the dhclient-script that has the
only significant changes made to it even in the udeb.

> - expat:                           1.95.8-1 | 1.95.8-3

udeb not used..

> - hdparm:                             5.9-4 | 6.1-1

udeb not used..

> - lvm2:                           2.01.04-3 | 2.01.04-5

Looks good.

> - ppp:                     2.4.3-20050321+1 | 2.4.3-20050321+2

udeb not used..

> - util-linux:                       2.12-10 | 2.12p-4

Rather more changes than I'm comfortable with, however we do only use
fdisk from it, which is only used non-manually on an arch or two by
partitioner.

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: