[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#306516: marked as done (Should use "CD-ROM" instead of CDROM in templates)



Your message dated Sun, 1 May 2005 12:04:39 -0400
with message-id <20050501160439.GA15914@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 05:49:39 +0000
>From bubulle@kheops.frmug.org Tue Apr 26 22:49:39 2005
Return-path: <bubulle@kheops.frmug.org>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DQfQZ-0000EK-00; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:49:39 -0700
Received: from cc-mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id j3R5nZrI023320;
        Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:49:37 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 7426)
	id C912B2328A; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:19:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:19:38 +0200
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: Eddy Petrisor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-i18n@lists.debian.org
Subject: Should use "CD-ROM" instead of CDROM in templates
Message-ID: <20050427051937.GQ6054@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
References: <426EBFD8.7090602@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <426EBFD8.7090602@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: cdrom-retriever
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i

Quoting Eddy Petrisor (eddy.petrisor@gmail.com):
> Hello all,
> 
> While I was trying to reduce the number of unknown words with zinosat's 
> scripts I found that the original files contained inconsistent ways of 
> writing words:
> 
> CD-ROM/CDROM :
> 
> $ cat ro.po | perl -s ../../scripts/l10n/l10n-spellcheck/extract_msg.pl 
> -msgid | grep -E "CD.?ROM" | wc -l
> 46
> $ cat ro.po | perl -s ../../scripts/l10n/l10n-spellcheck/extract_msg.pl 
> -msgid | grep -E "CD-ROM" | wc -l
> 43
> $ cat ro.po | perl -s ../../scripts/l10n/l10n-spellcheck/extract_msg.pl 
> -msgid | grep -E "CDROM" | wc -l
> 4

Well spotted...

Indeed, 3 of the 4 occurrences of "CDROM" are in cdrom-retriever, the
latter being a variable name in cdrom-checker, thus irrelevant.

This is obviously a consistency bug, hence reporting it to
cdrom-retriever (this mail is BCC'ed to the BTS).

I will fix it but will probably NOT unfuzzy translations as this will
force translators to check consistency in their own translations.

This is a good occasion for me to have fr alone at 100% for some time
as you all know this is my only goal in that business..:)

In D-I, "CD-ROM" is used only for the media. "Drive" or "CD-ROM drive"
should be used when talking about the hardware.



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 306516-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2005 16:01:51 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun May 01 09:01:51 2005
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DSGtD-0007JW-00; Sun, 01 May 2005 09:01:51 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
	by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF59417DC8;
	Sun,  1 May 2005 16:01:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CBE586E4D1; Sun,  1 May 2005 12:04:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 12:04:39 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 216084-done@bugs.debian.org, 218774-done@bugs.debian.org,
	222500-done@bugs.debian.org, 266624-done@bugs.debian.org,
	306516-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20050501160439.GA15914@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 306516-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5


--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Closing bugs fixed in recent not-really-nmu.

--=20
see shy jo

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCdP4Wd8HHehbQuO8RAj3HAJ9QssZ0OWobeB09O2tmG7fHlHhR8ACg1zvp
IV956j1FtqTHGoND+IDdZyE=
=PTOm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--



Reply to: