[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sources vs udeb mismatch in sarge



On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 03:38:48PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> cdebconf: udeb's are from 0.72, but in sarge is 0.74.
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Colin: please check.

> discover: udeb's are from 2.0.7-2, but in sarge is 2.0.7-2.1
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge (no
>      udeb-related changes anyway)

Not used by d-i[1].

> evms: udeb's are from 2.5.1-1, sarge has 2.5.2-1
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Not officially supported by d-i, only used by experts. No other
dependencies. License is GPL, needs update or removal.

> freetype: udeb's are from 2.1.7-2.3, sarge has 2.1.7-2.4
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Not used by d-i.

> glib2.0: udeb's are from 2.4.8-1, sarge has 2.6.4-1
>  Ew... is it safe to have 2.6 udeb's in sarge? I hope so... Reverting
>    sarge to 2.4 is not possible (short of doing an epoch'd upload)

Not used by d-i.

> glibc: udeb's are from 2.3.2.ds1-20, sarge has 2.3.2.ds1-21
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Needs update, clean.

> hdparm: udeb's are from 5.9-4, sarge has 6.1-1
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Not used by d-i.

> nano: udeb's are from 1.2.4-3, sarge has 1.2.4-5
>  Suggested resolution: accept the udeb's from sid into sarge

Always installed. New udeb will trigger an update of the package by
anna, which is only partialy considered as possible.

> zlib: udeb's are from 1:1.2.2-4, sarge has 1:1.2.2-3
>  Suggested resolution: Freeze-exception for 1:1.2.2-4

Used by ssh. Release team: please check the update.

This means the following packages are clean and should be updated in
sarge ASAP:
- discover
- freetype
- glib2.0
- glibc
- hdparm

The following package needs update or removal:
- evms

Bastian

[1] means: no menu item, not used in the package list from the build
environment, not reverse dependency from a installable package.

-- 
Conquest is easy. Control is not.
		-- Kirk, "Mirror, Mirror", stardate unknown

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: