[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297984: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)



Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:14:49 +0200
with message-id <20050303201449.GA3507@intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua>
and subject line Bug#297984: Package: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 20:00:15 +0000
>From james.umbanhowar@myrealbox.com Thu Mar 03 12:00:15 2005
Return-path: <james.umbanhowar@myrealbox.com>
Received: from ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) [24.25.9.100] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6wUU-00046I-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:00:15 -0800
Received: from [192.168.15.100] (cpe-065-187-214-013.nc.rr.com [65.187.214.13])
	by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j23K06bo017672
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:00:07 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <[🔎] 4227356F.2030402@myrealbox.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:03:59 -0500
From: James Umbanhowar <james.umbanhowar@myrealbox.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050203)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package: installation-reports
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
	HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: <Fill in date and from where you got the image>
uname -a: <The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt>
Date: <Date and time of the install>
Method: <How did you install?  What did you boot off?  If network
      install, from where?  Proxied?>

Machine: <Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)>
Processor:
Memory:
Root Device: <IDE?  SCSI?  Name of device?>
Root Size/partition table: <Feel free to paste the full partition
      table, with notes on which partitions are mounted where.>
Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O ]
Configure network HW:   [O ]
Config network:         [O ]
Detect CD:              [O ]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives:     [O ]
Partition hard drives:  [O ]
Create file systems:    [O ]
Mount partitions:       [O ]
Install base system:    [O ]
Install boot loader:    [O ]
Reboot:                 [E ]

Comments/Problems:  There was a kernel panic on the first reboot.  It couldn't detect the ide interface of something (sorry, didn't write it down).  On reboot it worked fine.

My only thought is that it might be nice to give the option to folks to install unstable on boot, since it seems a large number do this anyway.  I have a friend who is fairly linux savvy who downloaded the entire testing system prior to upgrading.





---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297984-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Mar 2005 20:14:55 +0000
>From eugen@univ.kiev.ua Thu Mar 03 12:14:55 2005
Return-path: <eugen@univ.kiev.ua>
Received: from boy.univ.kiev.ua (mail.univ.kiev.ua) [193.125.78.122] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6wik-0005on-00; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 12:14:54 -0800
Received: from intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua (intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua [10.25.0.243])
	by mail.univ.kiev.ua (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j23KEnjd044422;
	Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:14:50 +0200 (EET)
Received: from eugen by intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1D6wif-0001HD-Ht; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:14:49 +0200
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:14:49 +0200
To: James Umbanhowar <james.umbanhowar@myrealbox.com>,
   297984-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#297984: Package: installation-reports
Message-ID: <20050303201449.GA3507@intel4.icc.univ.kiev.ua>
References: <[🔎] 4227356F.2030402@myrealbox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 4227356F.2030402@myrealbox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <eugen@univ.kiev.ua>
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on mail.univ.kiev.ua host
X-Antivirus-Code: 100000
Delivered-To: 297984-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

03.03.2005 =D0=BE 11:03 -0500 James Umbanhowar =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=
=81=D0=B0=D0=B2(-=D0=BB=D0=B0):
Closing bug report because there was no (reproducible) problems.
> =20
> Comments/Problems:  There was a kernel panic on the first reboot.  It=20
> couldn't detect the ide interface of something (sorry, didn't write it=20
> down).  On reboot it worked fine.
>=20
> My only thought is that it might be nice to give the option to folks to=
=20
> install unstable on boot, since it seems a large number do this anyway.  =
I=20
> have a friend who is fairly linux savvy who downloaded the entire testing=
=20
> system prior to upgrading.
>=20
There is such posibility. Boot in 'expert' mode and select to
install unstable.

--=20
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov

Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University
Information and Computing Centre
http://icc.univ.kiev.ua

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJ3A5KaC6+zmozOIRAgYpAJ0StkAK/jUZF1ERMEJNbh40BFDUFwCfTPHj
uUlPuKp4JV0ys2BjGR7fcpI=
=YE46
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--



Reply to: