Bug#294938: marked as done (d-i install-report)
Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:02:19 +0100
with message-id <200502130002.20029.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#294938: d-i install-report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 14:17:47 +0000
>From boll@wheel.dk Sat Feb 12 06:17:47 2005
Return-path: <boll@wheel.dk>
Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Czy5j-0007AF-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:17:47 -0800
Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1051)
id 58D0711607; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:17:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:17:45 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Boll Overgaard <boll@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: d-i install-report
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050212141745.GN6824@freesbee.wheel.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.0
X-PGP-Public-Key: http://soren.overgaard.org/cgi-bin/index?t=pgp
X-gnyf: flaf
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: <Fill in date and from where you got the image>
uname -a: Linux devel 2.6.10-1-686 #1 Tue Jan 18 04:34:19 EST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux (Not the kernel that came with the installer)
Date: Feb 10th 2005
Method:
Installed from d-i rc2 cdrom image. Booted from same image.
Packages downloaded from http://ftp.se.debian.org/ as http://ftp.dk.debian.org is defunct (according to TDC who hosts it)
No proxy was used.
Machine: Dell Poweredge sc420
Processor:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory:
1 GB
Root Device: /dev/sda1
Root Size/partition table:
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 255912 113178 129081 47% /
tmpfs 513448 0 513448 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda9 130045540 43184 123396432 1% /home
/dev/sda8 369000 53491 295849 16% /tmp
/dev/sda5 4807056 441940 4120932 10% /usr
/dev/sda6 2885780 128892 2610300 5% /var
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
lspci:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. Server Memory Controller Hub (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. Server Memory Controller Hub PCI Express Port (rev 04)
0000:00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. Graphics Controller (rev 04)
0000:00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03)
0000:00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev d3)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FR (ICH6/ICH6R) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) IDE Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03)
0000:02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 01)
0000:05:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 21154 PCI-to-PCI Bridge
0000:06:00.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 21154 PCI-to-PCI Bridge
0000:06:01.0 SCSI storage controller: QLogic Corp. ISP12160 Dual Channel Ultra3 SCSI Processor (rev 06)
0000:07:00.0 RAID bus controller: American Megatrends Inc. MegaRAID (rev 20)
lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2588 (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:2589 (rev 04)
0000:00:02.0 0300: 8086:258a (rev 04)
0000:00:1c.0 0604: 8086:2660 (rev 03)
0000:00:1c.1 0604: 8086:2662 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:2658 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:2659 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:265a (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:265b (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:265c (rev 03)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev d3)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2640 (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:266f (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2652 (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:266a (rev 03)
0000:02:00.0 0200: 14e4:1677 (rev 01)
0000:05:01.0 0604: 8086:b154
0000:06:00.0 0604: 8086:b154
0000:06:01.0 0100: 1077:1216 (rev 06)
0000:07:00.0 0104: 101e:1960 (rev 20)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [E]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [E]
Comments/Problems:
Booting from the default 2.4 kernel failed to detect the cdrom, whereas the 2.6 kernel had no problems with detection.
Rebooting mostly worked, except all interaction with the system clock seemed to hang. I.e. during the "Setting system clock using hardware clock as reference" or something to that effect, the boot sequence would just sit there, until i hit ctrl+c at which point it would proceed. The same thing happened during the second stage installer after I was prompted for whether the system clock was set to GMT.
Switching to another console, and installing the 2.6.10 kernel image and rebooting caused the base-installer to work as expected.
Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294938-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Feb 2005 23:02:41 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Sat Feb 12 15:02:41 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl (ha-smtp2.tiscali.nl) [195.241.80.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D06Hh-0004Rt-00; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:02:41 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [195.240.184.66])
by ha-smtp2.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4418048923A;
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:02:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: =?iso-8859-1?q?S=F8ren_Boll_Overgaard?= <boll@debian.org>,
294938-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#294938: d-i install-report
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:02:19 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[🔎] 20050212141745.GN6824@freesbee.wheel.dk> <[🔎] 200502121650.06381.aragorn@tiscali.nl> <[🔎] 20050212172623.GP6824@freesbee.wheel.dk>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050212172623.GP6824@freesbee.wheel.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502130002.20029.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 294938-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Saturday 12 February 2005 18:26, S=F8ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
> So it would seem. There has been no problem since the upgrade.
Thanks. I've added that info to that bug report.
I'm closing your installation report as there were no other issues.
Thanks for submitting the report.
Cheers,
=46JP
Reply to: