Bug#294723: marked as done (installation-reports)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:05:11 +0100
with message-id <200502111805.11964.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Bug#294723: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 11:14:21 +0000
>From mark+debinst@clearspeed.com Fri Feb 11 03:14:20 2005
Return-path: <mark+debinst@clearspeed.com>
Received: from koo.clearspeed.com (pixel.clearspeed.com) [195.10.240.2]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzYke-00058x-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 03:14:20 -0800
Received: from pixel.clearspeed.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pixel.clearspeed.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1BBEF54031030
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:14:15 GMT
Received: (from mark@localhost)
by pixel.clearspeed.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j1BBEEqG031029
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:14:14 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: pixel.clearspeed.com: mark set sender to mark+debinst@clearspeed.com using -f
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:14:14 +0000
From: Mark Ferguson <mark+debinst@clearspeed.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: installation-reports
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050211111414.GA30606@pixel.clearspeed.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian sarge rc2 i386 net install
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
down loaded on 2005-02-10
uname -a: Linux Pixie248 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2005-02-10 13:00
Method: cd boot of linux26, net install from ftp.uk.debian.org, no proxy
Machine: Dell Dimension 5000
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz
Memory: 512 Mb
Root Device: /dev/sda (SATA)
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160000000000 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19452 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 486 3903763+ 83 Linux /boot
/dev/sda2 19210 19452 1951897+ 82 Linux swap
/dev/sda3 487 19209 150392497+ 83 Linux /
Partition table entries are not in disk order
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 915G/P/GV Processor to I/O Controller (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 915G/P/GV PCI Express Root Port (rev 04)
0000:00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 1 (rev 03)
0000:00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) PCI Express Port 2 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #1 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #2 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #3 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB UHCI #4 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801 PCI Bridge (rev d3)
0000:00:1e.2 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FR (ICH6/ICH6R) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) IDE Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.2 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FW (ICH6/ICH6W) SATA Controller (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) SMBus Controller (rev 03)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5b60
0000:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 5b70
0000:04:03.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401 100Base-T (rev 01)
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:2580 (rev 04)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:2581 (rev 04)
0000:00:1c.0 0604: 8086:2660 (rev 03)
0000:00:1c.1 0604: 8086:2662 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.0 0c03: 8086:2658 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.1 0c03: 8086:2659 (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.2 0c03: 8086:265a (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.3 0c03: 8086:265b (rev 03)
0000:00:1d.7 0c03: 8086:265c (rev 03)
0000:00:1e.0 0604: 8086:244e (rev d3)
0000:00:1e.2 0401: 8086:266e (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.0 0601: 8086:2640 (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.1 0101: 8086:266f (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2651 (rev 03)
0000:00:1f.3 0c05: 8086:266a (rev 03)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 1002:5b60
0000:01:00.1 0380: 1002:5b70
0000:04:03.0 0200: 14e4:4401 (rev 01)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [E]
Comments/Problems:
config network had to retry at least twice for dhcp to configure it.
reboot failed after real time clock driver message
- seems to be a known problem
- added apci=off to kernel boot options to continue
xserver ati driver did not work with this ati graphics card
(but thats not an install problem ;-)
M.
--
Mark Ferguson
ClearSpeed Technology plc Tel: +44 117 3172000
3110 Great Western Court, Hunts Ground Road Fax: +44 117 3172002
Stoke Gifford, BRISTOL BS34 8HP England http://www.clearspeed.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Feb 2005 17:07:36 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Fri Feb 11 09:07:36 2005
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl (ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl) [195.241.80.19]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzeGW-0001AP-00; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:07:36 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl (195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl [195.240.184.66])
by ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C71393E466;
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:05:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
To: Mark Ferguson <mark+debinst@clearspeed.com>,
294723-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#294723: installation-reports
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:05:11 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[🔎] 20050211111414.GA30606@pixel.clearspeed.com>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20050211111414.GA30606@pixel.clearspeed.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502111805.11964.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 294723-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Friday 11 February 2005 12:14, Mark Ferguson wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> config network had to retry at least twice for dhcp to configure it.
That can happen on some networks.
> reboot failed after real time clock driver message
> - seems to be a known problem
> - added apci=off to kernel boot options to continue
See also: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=277298
That has a probably better workaround.
Thank you for your installation report. I'm closing it as the installation
was successful with only known issues.
Cheers,
FJP
Reply to: