On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:21:15AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > In a sense we're not done with beta2 yet, since we have between 1 and > > 2.5 architectures that are still in positions to possibly be added to > > the beta in a week or two. At the same time, I am eager to open unstable > > back up to continued development especially with so many improvements > > already waiting to go in. The conflict here is that if a package is > > destablised in unstable, and then the beta2 "backport" needs to get a > > minor fix to that package into sarge to make it work on a pending > > architecture, I won't be able to get that fix into sarge; it will be > > blocked by the changes in unstable. > I am dubious about the non-newpmac powerpc architectures. The subarch > handling that did work in Oldenbourg has been disabled, and there is not > yet support for different initrd's and kernels for a same arch. Would > enabling this inside the beta2 branch not create risk of breaking > something else ? Surely such changes must be tested on the CVS trunk first? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpWGSC6KHwJ_.pgp
Description: PGP signature