[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#266565: marked as done (when selecting /boot as a mountpoint, partition should be marked bootable)



Your message dated Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:39:14 +0200
with message-id <20041204143914.GC7794@logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
and subject line Bug#266565: when selecting /boot as a mountpoint, partition should be marked bootable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2004 09:55:25 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Wed Aug 18 02:55:25 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.182] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BxNAD-0001EG-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 02:55:25 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.194.252 with login)
  by smtp803.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 09:55:24 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706F82A9590
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 02:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BxNAB-00015J-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 02:55:23 -0700
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 02:55:23 -0700
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: when selecting /boot as a mountpoint, partition should be marked bootable
Message-ID: <20040818095523.GA1584@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: partman
Severity: minor

Currently, if a partition's mountpoint defaults to /, and one sets it to
/boot, the disklabel changes along with it but the bootable flag should
also get set. In 99% of cases that's the correct thing to do. The other
1% of installs involves people with a separate special bootloader who
know what to do with it.. so I don't think it's harmful.

Thanks.

-- 
Joshua Kwan

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 266565-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2004 13:35:09 +0000
>From zinoviev@fmi.uni-sofia.bg Sat Dec 04 05:35:09 2004
Return-path: <zinoviev@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
Received: from lio.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Caa44-0006th-00; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 05:35:08 -0800
Received: from logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg ([62.44.100.59])
	by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg;
	Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:30:41 +0200
Received: from zinoviev by logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Cab46-0002dG-00; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 16:39:14 +0200
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:39:14 +0200
From: Anton Zinoviev <anton@lml.bas.bg>
To: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>, 266565-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#266565: when selecting /boot as a mountpoint, partition should be marked bootable
Message-ID: <20041204143914.GC7794@logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
References: <20040818095523.GA1584@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040818095523.GA1584@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Anton Zinoviev <zinoviev@fmi.uni-sofia.bg>
Delivered-To: 266565-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

I am sorry for the delayed responce.

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:55:23AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> 
> Currently, if a partition's mountpoint defaults to /, and one sets it to
> /boot, the disklabel changes along with it but the bootable flag should
> also get set. In 99% of cases that's the correct thing to do. The other
> 1% of installs involves people with a separate special bootloader who
> know what to do with it.. so I don't think it's harmful.

At present on i386 partman does nothing about the bootable flag.  By
default grub and lilo are installed in mbr so this flag has no meaning.
If the user decides to install the boot loader in another partition then
only the user knows which will be that partition (in this case I think
that grub and lilo installers have to change the bootable flag, not
partman).  The partition to boot from is not necessarily the partition
containing /boot - it may be any partition.  The boot partition contains
only the first stage of the boot loader, this first stage loader has the
job to load the other parts of the boot loader from the partition
containing /boot.

Anton Zinoviev




Reply to: