Bug#281645: installation-reports: OOo installation failed
At Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:41:56 -0500,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > Machine: AMD64, 1GB memory, 130GB P-ATA HDD, RTL8169 NIC, IEEE1394,
> > GeForceFX5200 SVGA.
>
> Were you installing debian unstable i386 on this amd64? I can't tell
> from your report.
Oops, sorry. I installed 'testing' i386.
> > The problem is caused by OpenOffice.org dependency problem:
> > Hmm, I remember joeyh removed openoffice from desktop selection, but
> > tasksel/tasks/desktop in svn remains:
> > # openoffice is the best word processor / office suite at the moment
> > openoffice.org-bin
>
> I never removed all of openoffice.org from the desktop task. I don't see
> any depenency problems with installs of the desktop task on testing or
> unstable, either.
Hmm, that's strange. I'll try again on another machine.
> > If we want to have openoffice.org, we should have -l10n- packages.
> > If we don't want to have -l10n- packages, openoffice.org should be
> > removed.
>
> I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Well, do we have OpenOffice.org for desktop selection finally?
If so, will we revert l10n packages when OOo is ready for Sarge?
Current tasks/japanese-desktop:
# commented out for reason explained in changelog 2.11
# openoffice.org-l10n-ja
# openoffice.org-help-ja
--
Kenshi Muto
kmuto@debian.org
Reply to: