Bug#275222: marked as done (Successful installation)
Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:32:25 +0100
with message-id <200411111732.25228.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
and subject line Fwd: Re: Bug#275222: Successful installation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2004 19:08:31 +0000
>From hans@woefdram.nl Wed Oct 06 12:08:31 2004
Return-path: <hans@woefdram.nl>
Received: from woefdram.demon.nl [82.161.31.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CFH9K-0002Gc-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 12:08:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by woefdram.demon.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855743A726
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:08:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Hans van Zijst <hans@woefdram.nl>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Successful installation
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410062029470.24642@morpheus.woefdram.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Debian-Installer pre-rc2,
downloaded on Oct. 5 from www.nl.debian.org
uname -a: Linux dozer 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Tue Sep 14 00:22:58 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 5 Oct 2004
Method: Netinstall over http, booted from CD. Fixed RAID and LVM before starting partitioner.
Machine: Clone, self-built
Processor: Intel PII (Deschutes), 400MHz
Memory: 384M
Root Device: IDE (RAID), hda = "Maxtor 52049U4", hdc = "WDC WD200BB-60CVB0"
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda: 20.4 GB, 20490559488 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 39703 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 1 98 49360+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hda2 99 1068 488880 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hda3 1069 38792 19012896 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hda4 38793 39703 459144 83 Linux
Disk /dev/hdc: 20.0 GB, 20020396032 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38792 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdc1 * 1 98 49360+ fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hdc2 99 1068 488880 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/hdc3 1069 38792 19012896 fd Linux raid autodetect
Output of `cat /proc/mdstat`:
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 hda1[0] hdc1[1]
49280 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 hda3[0] hdc3[1]
19012800 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 hda2[0] hdc2[1]
488768 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
Output of `vgdisplay`:
--- Volume group ---
VG Name vg00
System ID
Format lvm2
Metadata Areas 1
Metadata Sequence No 4
VG Access read/write
VG Status resizable
MAX LV 0
Cur LV 3
Open LV 3
Max PV 0
Cur PV 1
Act PV 1
VG Size 18.13 GB
PE Size 1.00 MB
Total PE 18566
Alloc PE / Size 1000 / 1000.00 MB
Free PE / Size 17566 / 17.15 GB
VG UUID GKwzyd-r6Yv-0uLq-ZP3U-EmY4-K4wE-c8Bgbx
Output of `lvscan`:
ACTIVE '/dev/vg00/root' [500.00 MB] inherit
ACTIVE '/dev/vg00/tmp' [250.00 MB] inherit
ACTIVE '/dev/vg00/var' [250.00 MB] inherit
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 02)
0000:00:04.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
0000:00:04.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
0000:00:04.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
0000:00:04.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
0000:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 30)
0000:00:0b.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c895 (rev 01)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G200 AGP (rev 01)
0000:00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 02)
0000:00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 02)
0000:00:04.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02)
0000:00:04.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01)
0000:00:04.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01)
0000:00:04.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02)
0000:00:09.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 30)
0000:00:0b.0 0100: 1000:000c (rev 01)
0000:01:00.0 0300: 102b:0521 (rev 01)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Nice, very nice. Finally a Debian that installs with RAID and LVM!
Couldn't find a way to make installer create RAID arrays and use one of them
for LVM, so I did it myself. When I got to the point where I had to partition
the disks, I fired up a terminal, created the RAID arrays, ran pvcreate,
vgcreate and lvcreate and returned to the installer. The partitioner happily
detected the RAID arrays and logical volumes I had just made, and everything
installed just fine from there.
At boot time, however, I get these messages (I installed 2 different machines
and got the same messages while booting):
devfs_mk_dev: could not append to parent for /disc
devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<4>devfs_mk_dev: could not append to parent for /disc
devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<4>devfs_mk_dev: could not append to parent for /disc
devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<4>devfs_mk_dev: could not append to parent for /disc
devfs_mk_dir: invalid argument.<4>devfs_mk_dev: could not append to parent for /disc
I get 129 of these ones... After that, I get these:
VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev dm-0.
VFS: Can't find ext2 filesystem on dev dm-0.
VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev dm-0.
VFS: Can't find ext2 filesystem on dev dm-0.
...which is correct, because I use JFS on my logical volumes (I don't like
the idea of unmounting an active volume after a vgextend). Finally there's
this bit:
cpci_hotplug: CompactPCI Hot Plug Core version: 0.2
pci_hotplug: PCI Hot Plug PCI Core version: 0.5
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKA._STA] (Node cfffbd20), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKA._STA] (Node cfffbd20), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKB._STA] (Node cfae5840), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKB._STA] (Node cfae5840), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKC._STA] (Node cfae5740), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKC._STA] (Node cfae5740), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKD._STA] (Node cfae5640), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKD._STA] (Node cfae5640), AE_NOT_EXIST
pciehp: acpi_pciehprm:\_SB_.PCI0 evaluate _BBN fail=0x5
pciehp: acpi_pciehprm:get_device PCI ROOT HID fail=0x5
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKA._STA] (Node cfffbd20), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKA._STA] (Node cfffbd20), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKB._STA] (Node cfae5840), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKB._STA] (Node cfae5840), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKC._STA] (Node cfae5740), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKC._STA] (Node cfae5740), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-1133: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKD._STA] (Node cfae5640), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI-0154: *** Error: Method execution failed [\_SB_.LNKD._STA] (Node cfae5640), AE_NOT_EXIST
shpchp: acpi_shpchprm:\_SB_.PCI0 evaluate _BBN fail=0x5
shpchp: acpi_shpchprm:get_device PCI ROOT HID fail=0x5
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 275222-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2004 16:32:56 +0000
>From aragorn@tiscali.nl Thu Nov 11 08:32:56 2004
Return-path: <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CSHsW-0003V7-00; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:32:56 -0800
Received: from strider.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.86] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CSHs1-00044l-00
for <275222-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:32:25 +0100
From: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Subject: Fwd: Re: Bug#275222: Successful installation
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:32:25 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
To: 275222-done@bugs.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200411111732.25228.aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Delivered-To: 275222-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Closing the report based on the attached mail.
Thank you for following up.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Bug#275222: Successful installation
Date: Thursday 11 November 2004 17:05
From: Hans van Zijst <hans@woefdram.nl>
To: Frans Pop <aragorn@tiscali.nl>
Hi Frans,
Thanks for the reaction. I checked out the daily build and indeed I
didn't have to prepare RAID and LVM myself anymore. Very nice.
I'll experiment a bit with blacklisting hotplug devices, I have to setup
several servers the next few weeks. They're all going to be Sarge.
Cheers,
Hans
Reply to: