Bug#279590: marked as done (base-config: http/proxy fails to preseed)
Your message dated Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:17:03 -0500
with message-id <E1CQ9a3-0000ek-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#279590: fixed in base-config 2.55
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2004 23:22:24 +0000
>From ptelford@ros-saab.rose.hp.com Wed Nov 03 15:22:24 2004
Return-path: <ptelford@ros-saab.rose.hp.com>
Received: from atorelbas03.hp.com (palrel12.hp.com) [156.153.255.237]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CPUSO-0000sr-00; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:22:24 -0800
Received: from smtp2.rose.hp.com (smtp2.rose.hp.com [15.96.64.24])
by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 056B740AE0D; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ros-saab.rose.hp.com (ros-saab.rose.hp.com [15.43.213.64])
by smtp2.rose.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CE9644E4; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ptelford by ros-saab.rose.hp.com with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CPUSK-0000sL-6u; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:22:20 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Telford <pxt@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: base-config: http/proxy fails to preseed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 15:22:20 -0800
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1CPUSK-0000sL-6u@ros-saab.rose.hp.com>
Sender: PxT <ptelford@ros-saab.rose.hp.com>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ptelford@ros-saab.rose.hp.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on ros-saab.rose.hp.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
WEIRD_PORT autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: base-config
Version: 2.40.8
Severity: normal
base-config seems to ignore the proxy settings I specify during the
first stage of the installer, leading to a warning message which
interrups a pre-seeded installation. Specifically, I'm setting
d-i mirror/http/proxy string http://web-proxy.rose.hp.com:8088/
in my preseed file. The value is getting copied to config.dat, but apt-setup
doesn't seem to be honoring it. Not sure how I can debug this further.
Tested using the netinst iso from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/20041102/
Thanks,
Paul.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 279590-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2004 19:24:34 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Nov 05 11:24:33 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CQ9hJ-0003qo-00; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 11:24:33 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CQ9a3-0000ek-00; Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:17:03 -0500
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 279590-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#279590: fixed in base-config 2.55
Message-Id: <E1CQ9a3-0000ek-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:17:03 -0500
Delivered-To: 279590-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: base-config
Source-Version: 2.55
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
base-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
base-config_2.55.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.55.dsc
base-config_2.55.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.55.tar.gz
base-config_2.55_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.55_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 279590@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated base-config package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:29:21 -0500
Source: base-config
Binary: base-config
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.55
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description:
base-config - Debian base system configurator
Closes: 279590
Changes:
base-config (2.55) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Re-register questions that are debconf-copydb'd from the d-i database,
to entries that they have sane templates. Closes: #279590
* Translations
- Albanian fixed (double space removed).
Files:
6cfeaa0b6178dc7ec836fdbf8c68245b 715 base optional base-config_2.55.dsc
414cc6f8f4dabdf8fc24fa7b9bb20ea8 387374 base optional base-config_2.55.tar.gz
a484a990d3ec893a4f8fded22b0d95bb 304638 base optional base-config_2.55_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBi8z32tp5zXiKP0wRAu6yAJ9dWVN5i13Bs+qwk/mZxoh//gqSIgCgivy0
pPLjjD/5G+JL6SzVE1LWnL0=
=UsH5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: