Bug#237120: marked as done ([i386] [beta2] [netinst] swap, language, lilo problems)
Your message dated Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400
with message-id <20041013203701.GA20371@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing reports due to lack of response from submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2004 20:42:14 +0000
>From miroslav@suchy.cz Tue Mar 09 12:42:14 2004
Return-path: <miroslav@suchy.cz>
Received: from wema.vslesy.cz (vslesy.cz) [194.108.48.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B0o3K-0000U2-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:42:14 -0800
Received: from suchy.cz ([194.108.48.21])
by vslesy.cz (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with ESMTP id i29Kg9x02527
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 21:42:09 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: wema.vslesy.cz: Host [194.108.48.21] claimed to be suchy.cz
Message-ID: <404E2C1C.4080007@suchy.cz>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 21:42:04 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Miroslav_Such=FD?= <miroslav@suchy.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1
X-Accept-Language: cs, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Debian Installation Report
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-09 from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2004-03-09
Method: base packages from cd, then security upgrade from inet.
Machine:
Processor: P4 (Prescott/HT) 2.8GHz
Memory: 512MiB DDR400MHz
Root Device: SATA
Root Size/partition table:
80GiB splitted into 70 GiB (/) and 10GiB (swap)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect DVD+-RW: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [E]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
I create 10GiB swap partition but installer create only 2GiB swap partition. I
fixed it: swapoff -a; mkswap -v1 /dev/hda2; swapon -a
Additonaly after reboot was broken fonts - I choose czech language - during
instalation was everything OK, but after reboot, there problem with some chars
with accents (accented r, s and some others).
I also find some problem, but I'm not sure if it's related to installer. After
installation I immediately upgrade to unstable and to kernel 2.6 from deb
package. But lilo warn me that /proc/partitions points to non exist directory
/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 and replaced it with /dev/hda. And the new
kernel panic when it try to mount root fs.
Regards
Mirek Suchy
--
,,,
(o o)
=================================oOO==(_)==OOo===========
) mailto:miroslav@suchy.cz
( ICQ: #70802630 tel:+420-603-775737
) Thank God I'm an atheist.
(________________________________________Oooo._____________
.oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 237120-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2004 21:47:42 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Wed Oct 13 14:47:42 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CHqyE-0007Bk-00; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:47:42 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3A6182D5;
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:35:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C8D056E393; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:01 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 230977-done@bugs.debian.org, 233007-done@bugs.debian.org,
233978-done@bugs.debian.org, 234605-done@bugs.debian.org,
234687-done@bugs.debian.org, 235096-done@bugs.debian.org,
235342-done@bugs.debian.org, 235418-done@bugs.debian.org,
235540-done@bugs.debian.org, 235691-done@bugs.debian.org,
236142-done@bugs.debian.org, 236845-done@bugs.debian.org,
237120-done@bugs.debian.org, 237418-done@bugs.debian.org,
238115-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing reports due to lack of response from submitter
Message-ID: <20041013203701.GA20371@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 237120-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SORTED_RECIPS,
SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 13
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm closing this installation report, since request(s) for more information
were not answered. If you still experience the problem, or if you can tell
us the information we originally asked for, please write back and tell us.
Note that much newer versions of the installer are now available, which fix
a lot of bugs, including possibly the ones you reported.
--=20
see shy jo
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBbZHtd8HHehbQuO8RAp85AKC1tYxTRCLmcUAXJifoDXUtStudowCg5iqU
B8EBP1zmVNUGyWWJiu0dtuE=
=IVla
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Reply to: