Bug#269805: marked as done (debian-installer: hotplug configuration leaves mail in /var/mail/mail)
Your message dated Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:41:32 -0400
with message-id <20041003214132.GA9960@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2004 01:54:58 +0000
>From ecc@cmu.edu Thu Sep 02 18:54:58 2004
Return-path: <ecc@cmu.edu>
Received: from ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.220.166]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C33I2-0002QZ-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 18:54:58 -0700
Received: from c-24-3-154-200.client.comcast.net ([24.3.154.200])
by ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa00911; 2 Sep 2004 21:49 EDT
Received: from ecc by stratocaster.home with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1C33CM-0005Rl-KF; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 21:49:06 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Eric C. Cooper" <ecc@cmu.edu>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: debian-installer: hotplug configuration leaves mail in /var/mail/mail
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 21:49:06 -0400
Message-Id: <E1C33CM-0005Rl-KF@stratocaster.home>
Sender: "Eric C. Cooper" <ecc@cmu.edu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
I tried the sarge rc1 netinst iso yesterday. Everything worked fine,
but the configuration of the hotplug package left mail from Debconf in
/var/mail/mail. Since exim4-config does not set up an alias for user
"mail", it is unlikely to get seen by anyone.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2004 21:44:37 +0000
>From joey@kitenet.net Sun Oct 03 14:44:37 2004
Return-path: <joey@kitenet.net>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CEE9l-0002v5-00; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 14:44:37 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B582418104
for <269805-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 21:40:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6B54A6E0D4; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:41:32 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 269805-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20041003214132.GA9960@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 269805-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think this is the exim brach of the bug, which they declined to
address. Ayway, we've fixed it in other ways in d-i.
--=20
see shy jo
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBYHIMd8HHehbQuO8RAhQYAKCDCEYGOtWegMmpOS+Suo03agtDNACgv+j3
vovIqQYAvki5PvhpW7W9atQ=
=uIhr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--
Reply to: