Re: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 override disparity

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 01:07:52PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 11:17:17AM -0400, Debian Installer wrote:
> > > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
> > > override file for the following file(s):
> > > 
> > > usb-storage-modules-2.6.8-power3-di_0.71_powerpc.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says extra.
> > > usb-storage-modules-2.6.8-power4-di_0.71_powerpc.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says extra.
> > > usb-storage-modules-2.6.8-powerpc-di_0.71_powerpc.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says extra.
> > 
> > Huh, i wonder what should happen for these ones ? Colin, i suppose you
> > set the priority of those, any hint on the correct priority ?
> 
> No, I didn't set those; have a look at the changelog entry for
> kernel-wedge 1.23.
> 
> I'd be inclined to have the override changed.

Ok, will you do it then ? You are more familiar with priority than me.

BTW, the current d-i netboot is broken, since the 2.6.8 modules are not in
sarge, this means that only d-i using sid .udebs are possible right now, which
is not so nice for testing, especially since partman seems to be utherly
broken in sid right now (claiming i have no harddisk).

Would it be possible to have the 2.6.8 .udeb packages moved to sarge without
removing the 2.6.7 ones ? Or alternatively, d-i to be changed to use the sarge
d-i, but always use the sid module .udebs from the same source the kernel is
coming ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther