Bug#265293: marked as done (The partman/confirm_nochanges dialog can be confusing)
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
with message-id <E1C2A9I-0006MK-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#265293: fixed in partman 50
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2004 22:02:56 +0000
>From 3ntr0p13@free.fr Sun Aug 01 15:02:56 2004
Return-path: <3ntr0p13@free.fr>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrOPw-0004sw-00; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 15:02:56 -0700
Received: from imp2-q.free.fr (imp2-q.free.fr [212.27.42.2])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7831C173623
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:02:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by imp2-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33)
id 6BAFC15B15; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:02:55 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kali.tirnamban.org (kali.tirnamban.org [82.227.17.82])
by imp2-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP
for <3ntr0p13@imap.free.fr>; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:02:55 +0200
Message-ID: <[🔎] 1091397775.410d688f5ca46@imp2-q.free.fr>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:02:55 +0200
From: 3ntr0p13@free.fr
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: should not show "configure LVM" menu entry if no LVM module is present
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4
X-Originating-IP: 82.227.17.82
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_40,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: partman
Version: 48
Installation using debian sarge 20040731 d-i netinst iso on a sparcstatio=
n5
system with one internal scsi hdd.
Partman menu offered me the choice to create a LVM partition, and I wante=
d to
try it, so I did the following :
- first I created a bootable reiserFS root partition and a swap partition=
, then
a LVM partition.
- I selected the "configure LVM" menu entry, had a message box telling th=
at
changes must be applied first, I said ok and had a message telling me tha=
t a
kernel module was missing, then I was offered with partman menu again.
-> I think that the menu entry should not be displayed if the kernel
module/tools are not present.
- frustrated but motivated :), I decided to continue the installation pro=
cess
and a message was then displayed telling me that no change was written an=
d that
it may lead to further problems.
-> I think this message should not appear is the partition scheme was ch=
anged
in a way or another between the moment partman was launched and the momen=
t we
live it, otherwise it might be quite confusing.
BTW : on first boot, the hard drive was found, but no partition was shown=
in the
partman menu under the drive's name. The disk had a 2,1 GB openbsd partit=
ion on
it. Selecting the harddrive in the partman menu lead to an untranslated e=
rror
message : "input/ouput error during read on
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target3/lun0/disc".I could not reproduce this proble=
m so I
just post it as a note
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265293-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2004 15:08:03 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Aug 31 08:08:03 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2AEt-0007iN-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:08:03 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2A9I-0006MK-00; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 265293-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#265293: fixed in partman 50
Message-Id: <E1C2A9I-0006MK-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:02:16 -0400
Delivered-To: 265293-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: partman
Source-Version: 50
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
partman_50.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.dsc
partman_50.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50.tar.gz
partman_50_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_50_i386.udeb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 265293@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> (supplier of updated partman package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:38:34 -0400
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 50
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Description:
partman - Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 259868 265293
Changes:
partman (50) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Anton Zinoviev
- definitions.sh (longint2human): round correctly the long integers.
Thanks to Thorsten Schaefer, closes: #259868.
- partman (confirm_changes): do not show the confirmation when there
are no changes to be written and at least one partition has been
already formatted. Thanks to ntr0p13 at free dot fr,
closes: #265293.
- parted_server.c: pretend that dvh partitin label does not support
extended/logical partitions:
- new function minimize_extended_partition that ignores requests to
minimize the extended partition
- partition_info: do not try to give proper device names of the
partitions, parted now is fixed
- command_partitions: do not show the logical partitions
- command_uses_extended: say dvh doesn't use extended partitions
* Updated translations:
- Arabic (ar.po) by Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj
- Bulgarian (bg.po) by Ognyan Kulev
- Bosnian (bs.po) by Safir Å eÄ?eroviÄ?
- Catalan (ca.po) by Jordi Mallach
- Welsh (cy.po) by Dafydd Harries
- Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
- Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Greek Translation Team
- Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
- French (fr.po) by French Team
- Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
- Croatian (hr.po) by Krunoslav Gernhard
- Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
- Lithuanian (lt.po) by KÄ?stutis BiliÅ«nas
- Latvian (lv.po) by Aigars Mahinovs
- Bøkmal, Norwegian (nb.po) by Bjørn Steensrud
- Norwegian Nynorsk (nn.po) by HÃ¥vard Korsvoll
- Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
- Russian (ru.po) by Yuri Kozlov
- Turkish (tr.po) by Recai OktaÅ?
Files:
ac885f0928a8dd72cb7b90887930eeac 654 debian-installer standard partman_50.dsc
f4f3390161a42137a9f8326399a556ac 124234 debian-installer standard partman_50.tar.gz
679e0d964c0a0e9be755b585e1943a0f 113688 debian-installer standard partman_50_i386.udeb
package-type: udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBNI4X2tp5zXiKP0wRAh5+AJ0beykdHjzYInC1tfAysAwf5hzrDQCgh/TA
PQsn63wnUU0J++MKxVcwlNw=
=wfzx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: