[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#264302: marked as done (installation: suggest 2 changes in user interface)



Your message dated Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:24:11 +0200
with message-id <200408091424.17192.frederik@dannemare.net>
and subject line Bug#264302: installation: suggest 2 changes in user interface
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 02:14:26 +0000
>From pecondon@mesanetworks.net Sat Aug 07 19:14:26 2004
Return-path: <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
Received: from admin.mesanetworks.net [69.93.53.226] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BtdCc-0008AS-00; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 19:14:26 -0700
Received: from [66.54.160.120] (helo=big.lan.gnu)
	by admin.mesanetworks.net with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1BtdCa-0003jo-Nb; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:14:24 -0600
Received: from pecondon by big.lan.gnu with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BtdCT-0004aF-Cw; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:14:17 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: installation: suggest 2 changes in user interface
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:14:17 -0600
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1BtdCT-0004aF-Cw@big.lan.gnu>
Sender: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>
X-MesaNetworks-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MesaNetworks-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: pecondon@mesanetworks.net
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - admin.mesanetworks.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - mesanetworks.net
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation
Severity: normal

I am using beta 4 net install to install Sarge.

In two places I was confused by the screen prompts. What they
say could be said better, I think.

1. Concerning GRUB, the user is given three choises:
	<go back>    <yes>    <no>
There is no indication that LILO is a supported option.
Instead, reword the preamble and give four choises:
	<go back>   <GRUB>  <LILO>  <NONE>

2. DHCP is given as the only choise, and sometimes the user is not
even warned. It seems it just happens without comment.  This should be
changed. Add a screen that offers, e.g.,

    <DHCP>   <manual configuration>

General comment: Very good. A vast improvement over what has been.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264302-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 12:22:15 +0000
>From frederik@dannemare.net Mon Aug 09 05:22:15 2004
Return-path: <frederik@dannemare.net>
Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk (host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bu9AM-0006rM-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 05:22:15 -0700
Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [::ffff:83.88.170.174])
  (AUTH: PLAIN admin@sentinel.dk)
  by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:27:27 +0200
  id 000230FF.41176DAF.000038A4
From: Frederik Dannemare <frederik@dannemare.net>
To: Paul E Condon <pecondon@mesanetworks.net>,
  264302-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#264302: installation: suggest 2 changes in user interface
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:24:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <[🔎] E1BtdCT-0004aF-Cw@big.lan.gnu>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1BtdCT-0004aF-Cw@big.lan.gnu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200408091424.17192.frederik@dannemare.net>
Delivered-To: 264302-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 08 August 2004 04:14, Paul E Condon wrote:
> Package: installation
> Severity: normal

Thank you for your feedback.

> I am using beta 4 net install to install Sarge.

Please don't use beta4. It's very, very old and rc1 has just released.

> In two places I was confused by the screen prompts. What they
> say could be said better, I think.
>
> 1. Concerning GRUB, the user is given three choises:
> 	<go back>    <yes>    <no>
> There is no indication that LILO is a supported option.
> Instead, reword the preamble and give four choises:
> 	<go back>   <GRUB>  <LILO>  <NONE>

It's by design and will not be changed for the final release of d-i.=20
Average users don't want too many things to choose from. Choose to boot=20
in expert mode to get more control.

> 2. DHCP is given as the only choise, and sometimes the user is not
> even warned. It seems it just happens without comment.  This should
> be changed. Add a screen that offers, e.g.,
>
>     <DHCP>   <manual configuration>

Again, it's by design and will not be changed for the final release of=20
d-i. Btw, if dhcp doesn't work, the user will have the choice of manual=20
configuration.

> General comment: Very good. A vast improvement over what has been.

Thank you. I'll close your report.
=2D --=20
=46rederik Dannemare | mailto:frederik@dannemare.net
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=3DFrederik+Dannemare
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBF2zuLSX61ZxOtagRArxoAKCZaaTncGxnUnxH+ttpJZpqe1as0wCfW/Ks
9HJ/d+ot/Gk762aL9sTdffs=3D
=3DLpMm
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: