[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#260686: marked as done (Sparc64 Install Report)



Your message dated Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:56:18 +0200
with message-id <200407211956.22676.frederik@dannemare.net>
and subject line Processed: Bug#260686: Sparc64 Install Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 17:12:27 +0000
>From master@tofu.mamane.lu Wed Jul 21 10:12:27 2004
Return-path: <master@tofu.mamane.lu>
Received: from 213-84-238-144.adsl.xs4all.nl (tofu.mamane.lu) [213.84.238.144] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BnKdn-00066z-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:12:27 -0700
Received: from master by tofu.mamane.lu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BnKdl-0007LD-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:12:25 +0200
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:12:25 +0200
From: Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Sparc64 Install Report
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040721171225.GA17570@tofu.mamane.lu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
X-Request-PGP: http://www.mamane.lu/openpgp/dh4096.asc
X-Debbugs-Cc: joostvb@mdcc.cx
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Lionel Elie Mamane <master@tofu.mamane.lu>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004/7/19 got from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.26-sparc64 #1 Fri Jun 18 02:04:50 PDT 2004 sparc64 GNU/Linux
Date: Tue Jul 20 21:41:10 CEST 2004
Method: netinst CD

Machine: Sun Ultra 5
Processor: UltraSPARC IIi 306MHz
cpu		: TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
fpu		: UltraSparc IIi integrated FPU
promlib		: Version 3 Revision 19
prom		: 3.19.4
type		: sun4u
ncpus probed	: 1
ncpus active	: 1
Cpu0Bogo	: 719.25
Cpu0ClkTck	: 0000000015752a00
MMU Type	: Spitfire
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table: 8.1GB
major minor  #blocks  name

   3     0    8420832 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc
   3     1    7910280 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
   3     2     510552 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
   3     3    8420832 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
Output of lspci: 
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Ultra IIi
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 13)
0000:00:01.1 PCI bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Simba Advanced PCI Bridge (rev 13)
0000:01:01.0 Bridge: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. EBUS (rev 01)
0000:01:01.1 Ethernet controller: Sun Microsystems Computer Corp. Happy Meal (rev 01)
0000:01:02.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro 215GP (rev 5c)
0000:01:03.0 IDE interface: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) PCI0646 (rev 03)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260686-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 17:56:08 +0000
>From frederik@dannemare.net Wed Jul 21 10:56:07 2004
Return-path: <frederik@dannemare.net>
Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk (host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BnLK3-0001DC-00; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:56:07 -0700
Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [::ffff:83.88.170.174])
  (AUTH: PLAIN admin@sentinel.dk)
  by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:01:02 +0200
From: Frederik Dannemare <frederik@dannemare.net>
To: 260686-done@bugs.debian.org,
  Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel@mamane.lu>
Subject: Processed: Bug#260686: Sparc64 Install Report
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:56:18 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: frederik@dannemare.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200407211956.22676.frederik@dannemare.net>
Delivered-To: 260686-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
	UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

thank you for your installation report.=20
Since it was successful, I will close this report.

Thanks,
=2D --=20
=46rederik Dannemare | mailto:frederik@dannemare.net
GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA/q5FLSX61ZxOtagRArduAJ9RG12HeFSpxGKurL1FOxxsuvwoLgCeJEfA
jTJH2FPTgcyUHpFAGQmu0tg=3D
=3D83Ov
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: