Bug#256861: marked as done (discover1 should have versioned dependancy on libdiscover1)
Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:35:05 -0700
with message-id <20040713203505.GA10777@mx.rackable.com>
and subject line fixed in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 14:30:18 +0000
>From mantas@akl.lt Tue Jun 29 07:30:18 2004
Return-path: <mantas@akl.lt>
Received: from (mantas.namai.lt) [193.219.14.141]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfJcn-00043U-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:30:18 -0700
Received: from mantas by mantas.namai.lt with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BfJck-0000Jc-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:30:14 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mantas Kriauciunas <mantas@akl.lt>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: discover1 should have versioned dependancy on libdiscover1
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.39
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:30:14 +0300
Message-Id: <E1BfJck-0000Jc-00@mantas.namai.lt>
Sender: Mantas Kriauciunas <mantas@akl.lt>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: discover1
Version: 1.6.1
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems discover1 should have versioned dependancy on libdiscover1,
because when I've installed newest version of discover1 (1.6.1)
on my system were left very old version of libdiscover1 (1.1-6).
Btw, it seems discover1 dependancies should be modified too, because
when I'm trying to install latest version of libdiscover1 (1.6.1) I got
a message, that new version discover-data (2.2004.05.03-4) package would
be removed and old package discover1-data will be installed instead.
I've checked (dpkg -s) discover-data package and found, that this package
provides discover1-data, so it should'nt be removed
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mantas.namai.lt 2.6.3-1-k7 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:39:50 EST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=lt_LT, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT
Versions of packages discover1 depends on:
ii ash 0.3.8-37 NetBSD /bin/sh
ii dash 0.4.21 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii debconf 1.2.23woody1 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdiscover1 1.1-6 hardware identification library
-- debconf information:
* discover/manage_cdrom_devices: true
* discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint: /media/
discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint_error:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256861-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2004 20:34:51 +0000
>From joshk@rackable.com Tue Jul 13 13:34:51 2004
Return-path: <joshk@rackable.com>
Received: from 64-60-248-69.cust.telepacific.net (mx.rackable.com) [64.60.248.69]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkTzD-0007ZO-00; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:34:47 -0700
Received: from vindicate.triplehelix.org ([10.201.1.117]) by mx.rackable.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0);
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:33:35 -0700
Received: from joshk by vindicate.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BkTzV-0002o2-SU
for 256861-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:35:05 -0700
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 13:35:05 -0700
From: Joshua Kwan <jkwan@rackable.com>
To: 256861-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in unstable
Message-ID: <20040713203505.GA10777@mx.rackable.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Sender: Joshua Kwan <joshk@rackable.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2004 20:33:35.0337 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABA9A590:01C46918]
Delivered-To: 256861-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
discover1 now depends on libdiscover1 (=3D ${Source-Version}) so this
problem is fixed.
--=20
Joshua Kwan
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)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=spqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--
Reply to: