Cameron Patrick wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 10:07:15PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > | > > It's in pci.ids, but it is not in the discover1-data database, or in > | > > usb-discover. > > Ahh. > > | > > You said that you loaded both ehci-hcd and usb-ohci by hand, and > | > > it seems to me you should only need one; so which is it, ohci or > | > > ehci? > | > > | > Although Cameron may only actually need one for this particular device, > | > it's apparently usual to have an EHCI controller doing USB 2.0 and a > | > companion controller, OHCI or UHCI, doing USB 1.0. > > That's correct. My particular USB drive works with just EHCI, but > most other USB devices I have (e.g. mouse, camera) are USB 1 and want > OHCI. > > | That makes sense, but then we still need to know which is which for > | completness. THe /proc/bus/pci/devices output should tell us. > > The 10de0067 is OHCI and 10de0068 is EHCI. Fixed in usb-discover, which means it should work for you using tomorrow's daily built images. I'm reassigning the bug to discover1-data to get it fixed there also. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature