Good evening! * Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> [040601 20:25]: > Um. This was bug #244589, and was fixed in busybox-cvs ages ago ... > > Aargh. WHY did that version of busybox-cvs-udeb never make it into > testing? I guess it must have been that stupid netcfg thing. We'll have > to pull 2.6 from powerpc rc1 if this can't be resolved. :( Sorry, I currently don't understand the problem with netcfg. We discovered this bug, while special creating a DVD, which we would like to hand out at LinuxTag this month at the Debian booth. What would happen, if we pull in unstables busybox-cvs-udeb? Yours sincerely, Alexander
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature