On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 10:42:17PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > - Is partman too slow to be used on m68k? No, at least not on the 040's and better. > Though apparently it's really bad on hppa and it's being used there. > There does exist the option of optimising it a bit.. I'd definitely like to see it optimised -- that and a few more progress bars. > > And WRT beta4: > > - Should the fixed version of partman be uploaded for a beta4 update? > > It changes behaviour on m68k, mips and s390; only m86k is in beta4 > > so far. (For mips, this update is needed for SGI aubarchitectures, > > that is, all currently supported ones.) > > I don't know about m68k, but for mips it seems yes, and we can copy the > update to testing for just the arches we choose and not have to worry > about breaking others. I think m68k is okay for beta 4. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature