[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#220267: marked as done (lilo-installer: unhelpful note about disk scan bypassed)



Your message dated Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:28:46 -0700
with message-id <20040410172846.GA28123@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 15:42:27 +0000
>From pete@azuro.com Tue Nov 11 09:42:26 2003
Return-path: <pete@azuro.com>
Received: from external.paradigm.com (mercury.azuro.com) [81.31.101.85] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AJaew-00015k-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:42:26 -0600
Received: from platinum (platinum.azuro.com [192.168.0.78])
	by mercury.azuro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825FA6964EC
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:42:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from chromium.azuro.com
	([192.168.0.24] helo=chromium ident=mail)
	by platinum with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AJaev-0005R1-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:42:25 +0000
Received: from pete by chromium with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AJaev-0006gc-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:42:25 +0000
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:42:25 +0000
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Install on Dell Latitude D600
Message-ID: <20031111154225.GD17273@chromium>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
From: Peter Clay <pete@azuro.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux cobalt 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux

Date: 10 Nov 2003
Method: Boot off CD-RW, install off network using a local apt-proxy

Machine: Dell Latitude D600
Processor: 1.4GHz
Memory: 512Mb
Root Device: /dev/hda5
Root Size/partition table:

Disk /dev/hda: 30.0 GB, 30005821440 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3648 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1               1           6       48163+  de  Dell Utility
/dev/hda2   *           7        3065    24571417+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda3            3066        3648     4682947+   5  Extended
/dev/hda5            3066        3551     3903763+  83  Linux
/dev/hda6            3552        3648      779121   82  Linux swap

Output of lspci:

00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82855PM Processor to I/O Controller (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82855PM Processor to AGP Controller (rev 03)
00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB2 (rev 01)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 81)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DBM LPC Interface Controller (rev 01)
00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DBM Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 01)
00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)
00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corp. 82801DB AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 01)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon Mobility 9000 M9] (rev 01)
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5702 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 02)
02:01.0 CardBus bridge: O2 Micro, Inc.: Unknown device 7113 (rev 20)
02:01.1 CardBus bridge: O2 Micro, Inc.: Unknown device 7113 (rev 20)
02:03.0 Network controller: Intel Corp. PRO/Wireless LAN 2100 3B Mini PCI Adapter (rev 04)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [E]
Reboot:                 [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

This machine has a bay which takes either a CD or a floppy drive. As a result,
loading the floppy module fails in hardware detection. I got the same error
message about this three times. It should accept the non-existence of the
floppy drive and give up.

The evil autopartitioner still runs, threatening to destroy all my data,
even though I've defined a partition table.

Lilo pops up an error message "can't find /proc/partitions, disk scan
bypassed" but works anyway.

The CD-auto-eject at the end of the install is a nice touch.

After rebooting, things are less well. The kernel complains repeatedly
about "can't find block-major-114". The installation asks me for apt mirror
information again - I've already entered this in the installer. After a
trip through tasksel, it tries to install a kernel. This results in an
error message which may be summarised as, "I'm about to do something
unnecessary which will break your system. Do you want to continue?"

Overall impression: hardware detection is good, installation is easy to
carry out and follow provided you dodge the autopartkit bullet, and it's
worked on a number of other machines I've tried it on. It just needs
polishing a little, and the after-reboot side needs better testing.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220267-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2004 17:28:47 +0000
>From joshk@triplehelix.org Sat Apr 10 10:28:47 2004
Return-path: <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Received: from smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.81] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BCMHf-0007T9-00; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:28:47 -0700
Received: from unknown (HELO triplehelix.org) (edkwan@sbcglobal.net@68.126.186.145 with login)
  by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2004 17:28:47 -0000
Received: from darjeeling.triplehelix.org (darjeeling.wifi.triplehelix.org [192.168.0.7])
	by triplehelix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A522DDD0
	for <220267-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joshk by darjeeling.triplehelix.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BCMHe-0007Jl-00
	for <220267-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:28:46 -0700
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 10:28:46 -0700
To: 220267-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: done
Message-ID: <20040410172846.GA28123@darjeeling.triplehelix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
From: Joshua Kwan <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Delivered-To: 220267-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1


--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This bug seems to have been dealt with in a previous upload (or two) of
lilo-installer. Thanks for reporting..

--=20
Joshua Kwan

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://triplehelix.org/~joshk/pubkey_gpg.asc
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=MgMH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C--



Reply to: