Re: 2.6 Development Step 1

[Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>]

Dan Weber wrote:

> The merge of module-init-tools with busybox would be a mess.  First,
> insmod, and rmmod appear to be 2.6 compliant from busybox cvs, but the
> depmod code is not nearly the same as it was in modutils.  I think we
> should take joey's idea and make a module-init-tools-udeb.  The
> maintainer has no issue packaging it with the standard distribution so
> this should go smoothly.
Hmm.  Would it be at all reasonable to use insmod and rmmod from busybox,
and just build depmod, modprobe, etc. from module-init-tools?  Or is that
too messy to be worth considering?

-- 
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/