Bug#226005: marked as done (installation-reports: Installation report (2004-01-02): many problems with french version of base config)
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:31:01 +0100
with message-id <200401311531.01926.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
and subject line Bug#226005: installation-reports: Installation report (2004-01-02): many problems with french version of base config
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jan 2004 17:30:25 +0000
>From seb128@debian.org Sat Jan 03 11:30:23 2004
Return-path: <seb128@debian.org>
Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.23]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AcmVa-0004rf-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 08:12:06 -0600
Received: from seb128 (ANancy-111-1-6-60.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.249.192.60])
by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id A2EB41800147; Sat, 3 Jan 2004 15:12:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from seb128 by seb128 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AcmVZ-0000sq-00; Sat, 03 Jan 2004 15:12:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: installation-reports: Installation report (2004-01-02): many problems with
french version of base config
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 15:12:05 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1AcmVZ-0000sq-00@seb128>
Sender: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_29
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2004-01-02
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
(Same config as in #220014).
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
Comments/Problems:
Some problems with the base config :
* Configuration for PPP ... what is PPP and apt ? Should an user know
that PPP is to set up a modem ?
Problems with french (work fine in english)
* Instead of jupping to the next entry the PPP configuration jump to the first
*
"Configurer apt
l'outil Debian de gestion des paquets"
This entry should not be on 2 lines (it's only "configure apt" in the english version).
And it doesn't work, base-config exits with :
"grep menu/.mnu: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type"
Works fine on english version ...
* Packages to intall:
"tasksel
aptitude
dselect
dselect
aptitude
dselect
deselect
aucun"
Why so many duplicated lines and empty lines ?
English version is just fine (4 lines, no duplicate, no empty).
Locales used: fr_FR@euro
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226005-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 14:27:17 +0000
>From simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch Sat Jan 31 06:27:17 2004
Return-path: <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Amw5d-0000mC-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:27:17 -0800
Received: from 80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch (80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.175.152])
by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id i0VERFWm010789
for <226005-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:27:15 +0100
From: Simon =?iso-8859-1?q?H=FCrlimann?= <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
To: 226005-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#226005: installation-reports: Installation report (2004-01-02): many problems with french version of base config
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:31:01 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <[🔎] E1AcmVZ-0000sq-00@seb128> <[🔎] 20040103211101.GB19455@kitenet.net>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040103211101.GB19455@kitenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401311531.01926.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Delivered-To: 226005-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Am Saturday 03 January 2004 22:11 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > Some problems with the base config :
> >
> > * Configuration for PPP ... what is PPP and apt ? Should an user know
> > that PPP is to set up a modem ?
>
> None of this is visible at the default priority, which base-config will
> run at in today's build of the installer.
>
> > Problems with french (work fine in english)
> >
> > * Instead of jupping to the next entry the PPP configuration jump to the
> > first
>
> Fixed.
>
> > * Packages to intall:
> >
> > "tasksel
> > aptitude
> > dselect
> >
> >
> > dselect
> >
> >
> > aptitude
> > dselect
> >
> >
> > deselect
> >
> > aucun"
> >
> > Why so many duplicated lines and empty lines ?
>
> Translator screwed up again, fixed.
We're in the process of cleaning up the stockpile of installation reports. As
yours doesn't contain any bugs that aren't fixed, this bug gets
closed now.
Thanx for testing d-i and sending this installation report!
Simon
Reply to: