Bug#226347: marked as done (Install report, i386, success)
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:29:22 +0100
with message-id <200401311429.22377.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
and subject line Bug#226347: Install report, i386, success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jan 2004 06:05:11 +0000
>From minghua@rice.edu Tue Jan 06 00:05:10 2004
Return-path: <minghua@rice.edu>
Received: from handler5.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.205]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AdfvA-0004bp-00; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:22:12 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by handler5.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9D0361DB1C; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:22:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from handler5.mail.rice.edu ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (handler5.mail.rice.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 04057-09; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:22:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from hexagon.mems.rice.edu (hexagon.mems.rice.edu [128.42.57.178])
by handler5.mail.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3BA4D1DB04; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:22:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from minghua by hexagon.mems.rice.edu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Adfzn-0002MJ-00; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:26:59 -0600
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:26:59 -0600
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: minghua@rice.edu
Subject: Install report, i386, success
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20040106012659.GA9064@hexagon.mems.rice.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Ming Hua <minghua@rice.edu>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-20030314-p2 at mail.rice.edu
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level:
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
downloaded on 2003.01.05, md5sum b355a7bd83354e3b93e14ee33dc8841b.
uname -a:
Linux danube 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
2003.01.05, 15:00 -0600
Method:
Boot from CD, install from CD
Machine: DIY-ed desktop
Processor: AMD Athlon, 1000 MHz
Memory: 516428 kB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda7, 18G
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP]
00:04.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22)
00:04.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:04.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:04.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:04.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Fortemedia, Inc Xwave QS3000A [FM801] (rev b2)
00:0a.1 Input device controller: Fortemedia, Inc Xwave QS3000A [FM801 game port] (rev b2)
00:11.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20265 (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC AGP (rev 7a)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system: [O]
Install boot loader: [O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
1. Temporary directory and file:
After installations and base-config, I have a empty directory
/cdrom0 and a file /tmp-Xhack (with one line: read-edid mdetect) under
my root directory. Are they temporary files for installation?
I cancelled the step of create unprivileged user step (because I
want to put that user in a group of different name than the username),
is that the reason these temporary file are not deleted?
2. lilo.conf template
In woody installation, the /etc/lilo.conf is generated from a nice
template with intensive comments. This templated makes modifying
lilo.conf much easier. However after this installation the lilo.conf is
just several lines without any comment. Is it possible to bring the
template with nice comment back?
Thanks for the wonderful work on Debian!
Ming
2004.01.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We used to think that if we know one, we know two, because one and one are
two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about ``and''.
--- Sir Arthur Eddington
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 226347-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 13:25:40 +0000
>From simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch Sat Jan 31 05:25:40 2004
Return-path: <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Amv80-0005XT-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 05:25:40 -0800
Received: from 80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch (80-219-175-152.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.175.152])
by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id i0VDPav7030939
for <226347-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:25:36 +0100
From: Simon =?iso-8859-1?q?H=FCrlimann?= <simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
To: 226347-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#226347: Install report, i386, success
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 14:29:22 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <[🔎] 20040106012659.GA9064@hexagon.mems.rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040106012659.GA9064@hexagon.mems.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401311429.22377.simon.huerlimann@access.unizh.ch>
Delivered-To: 226347-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Am Tuesday 06 January 2004 02:26 schrieb Ming Hua:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> INSTALL REPORT
>
> Debian-installer-version:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-netin
>st.iso downloaded on 2003.01.05, md5sum b355a7bd83354e3b93e14ee33dc8841b.
> uname -a:
> Linux danube 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
> Date:
> 2003.01.05, 15:00 -0600
> Method:
> Boot from CD, install from CD
>
> Comments/Problems:
>
> 1. Temporary directory and file:
> After installations and base-config, I have a empty directory
> /cdrom0 and a file /tmp-Xhack (with one line: read-edid mdetect) under
> my root directory. Are they temporary files for installation?
> I cancelled the step of create unprivileged user step (because I
> want to put that user in a group of different name than the username),
> is that the reason these temporary file are not deleted?
IIRC /tmp-Xhack shouldn't be installed anymore. /cdrom0 is created by discover
(the hardware autodetection) and is thought as the mount-point for the first
cdrom. Just delete it.
> 2. lilo.conf template
> In woody installation, the /etc/lilo.conf is generated from a nice
> template with intensive comments. This templated makes modifying
> lilo.conf much easier. However after this installation the lilo.conf is
> just several lines without any comment. Is it possible to bring the
> template with nice comment back?
This has already been reported as bug #229187
> Thanks for the wonderful work on Debian!
It's installation reports like yours that make it even more wonderful, thanx!
Simon
Reply to: