Re: Installation report
On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> over all possible strings to see how the translation worked. Yet, I
> have some questions - please do not get angry, if it has already
Some additions:
6. Partman redundancy - actions already done in partman (mount
points, file system) are re-asked in the base system installation.
I guess this will soon be addressed, as partman is evolving
7. Partman again: it definitely needs more file systems! I had a
feeling I am installing Windows'95 as I could choose between two
FAT*-systems and one ext-system
8. Partman is ugly! I am sorry, this is my personal opinion after
seeing the version on the current sid-daily (rather shortly) - and
partman seems to need a new upload too :) My personal problems:
- There is no status about which partition is being edited.
- No visual overview about which partitions are where, except for
the first screen, while it'd be more useful when changing some
partition!
- I think such small things like setting a bootable flag should not
take a whole menu item - it should be more like a checkbox.
Status is badly needed!
--
Nikolai Prokoschenko
nikolai@prokoschenko.de / Jabber: pronik@jabber.org
Reply to: