[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: busybox-cvs_20040101-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED



Debian Installer wrote:
> Accepted:
> busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-1_i386.udeb
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-floppy-udeb_20040101-1_i386.udeb
> busybox-cvs-static_20040101-1_i386.deb
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20040101-1_i386.deb
> busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-1_i386.udeb
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_20040101-1_i386.udeb
> busybox-cvs_20040101-1.diff.gz
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20040101-1.diff.gz
> busybox-cvs_20040101-1.dsc
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20040101-1.dsc
> busybox-cvs_20040101-1_i386.deb
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20040101-1_i386.deb
> busybox-cvs_20040101.orig.tar.gz
>   to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs_20040101.orig.tar.gz
> Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
> Closing bugs: 215612 216435 

If anyone is unclear on why uploading a new upstream version of busybox
to unstable is bloody stupid right now, I will be glad to explain it to
you..

-- 
see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: