[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#225858: "Validating %s" message untranslated from debootrstrap



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* On 02-01-04 - 03:35, Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> wrote: 

>  Sometimes, base-installer updates the progress bar to say "Validating %s".
>  If the install language is not English, this is untranslated too.
>  
>  It doesn't always happen. So far I think it only happens when installing
>  from a businesscard CD image. Even then, it does not happen for all the
>  debs on the image. I've seen it put the package name in properly for
>  some, and then display %s for one, and then go back to putting in the
>  package name for others.

These are some of the packages affected by the "Validating %s" problem
using businesscard ISOs.

2003-12-31 (md5sum a2c1f661d8eaa1323eedb49f825fc6b0):
apt apt-utils aptitude bsdmainutils debconf dpkg dselect
exim4-daemon-light fileutils grep groff-base libc6 libgcrypt1
libssl0.9.7 nvi pcmcia-cs perl-base ppp slang1 syslinux wget

2004-01-01 (md5sum 68cc6b72a04d1e8b979f85ef2d192ffe)
With this iso, in the "Receiving packages" step, packages are not
received but just validated. 
No packages seems to be affected by the problem, the "Validating x" string
is translated correctly and %s is replaced with package name.

However, after the packages extraction, debootstrap exits with an error
and I am unable to go on.

> My guess is that this is a problem tickled by something in the debootrap
> progress stream, and that it has to do with the wget progress data it
> displays.
It's probably wget-related since when the package is not received but just
validated, the bug do not appears.

- -- 
Emanuele Rocca     |      Medi come i ceti a cui appartengono,
ema@debian.org     |      terra terra come i missili cui assomigliano
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/9WTZC6DuA+rxm2ARAmvgAKCI7VdocPgKWx7PK6+T36y/ZXDGtwCeO1dr
TYSCfxBGWzwz2M30TkI+efA=
=IYY+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: