Re: Second round of powerpc subarch investigation : boot-loaders.
Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
> > > > CD. Should be no different then the normal Amiga m68k.
> > > >
> > > > Same "freeness" problems too that allways got ignored silently in the past.
> > >
> > > Well, the whole amiboot/apusboot stuff is free (GPLed even if i remember
> > > well), we ust didn't the work needed to cross build it from debian, that
> > > is all. It could go into contrib though.
> > Isn't apusboot linked against the public domain unix emulation
> > library?
> Yep, but it is free, isn't it ? If you ported it to a cross-gcc
> environment you could build it inside main.
Its part of gcc on amigaos iirc. I would consider it a system library
that doesn't need to be shipped in source anyway.
Just have the apusboot sources there.