Re: mklibs and brltty
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:04:39PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Could weak symbols solve the problem? I'm not very familiar with
> shared library internals, but I believe a weak symbol will be selected
> from the library if no other matching symbol is available. If the
> library provides such symbol, it would make mklibs happy, while the
> shared library linker would still select the symbol from the
> executable. Is this correct? I am mostly guessing based on the
> rumors I've heard about weak symbols.
dropping subdirs which aren't referenced via rpath from the resolver in
mklibs. none of that libs will be reduced.
bastian
--
It would be illogical to assume that all conditions remain stable.
-- Spock, "The Enterprise Incident", stardate 5027.3
Reply to: