Processed: Re: Bug#194631: better fix libbb than libc6-dev

To: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Cc: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>(busybox-cvs #194631)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#194631: better fix libbb than libc6-dev
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 08:48:14 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.105404271724771.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030527133825.GB5568@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 20030527133825.GB5568@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tag 194631 - patch
Bug#194631: asm/unistd.h: `__sc_4' conflicts with asm clobber list on powerpc
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch

> tag 194631 pending
Bug#194631: asm/unistd.h: `__sc_4' conflicts with asm clobber list on powerpc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#194631: better fix libbb than libc6-dev
  - From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: L10n of the installation manual (was Re: cvs commit to debian-installer/doc/manual/en by toff)
Next by Date: Re: L10n of the installation manual (was Re: cvs commit to debian-installer/doc/manual/en by toff)
Previous by thread: Bug#194631: better fix libbb than libc6-dev
Next by thread: Broken rules in d-i/utils/
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread