Bug#185530: marked as done (ethdetect: fails to load tulip.o module)
Your message dated 12 May 2003 08:53:01 +0200
with message-id <2flk7cwmzaq.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
and subject line (fwd) tulip card works in current d-i.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2003 23:37:22 +0000
>From alastair@saorleir.com Wed Mar 19 17:37:20 2003
Return-path: <alastair@saorleir.com>
Received: from (coll.saorleir.com) [195.218.107.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18vn7X-0002No-00; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:37:20 -0600
Received: by coll.saorleir.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C06593C487; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:10:01 +0000 (GMT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ethdetect: fails to load tulip.o module
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:10:01 +0000
Message-Id: <20030319231001.C06593C487@coll.saorleir.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ethdetect
Version: 0.22 (not installed)
Severity: normal
While it automatically loads the correct module in other cases,
ethdetect detects that I need a tulip.o module, but fails to load it.
(is this because tulip.o is in a subdir, and modprobe fails)?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux coll 2.4.20-686 #1 Mon Jan 13 22:22:30 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (ignored: LC_ALL set)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 185530-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2003 06:53:05 +0000
>From pre@saruman.uio.no Mon May 12 01:53:05 2003
Return-path: <pre@saruman.uio.no>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19F7BI-00031d-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 01:53:04 -0500
Received: from goggins.uio.no ([129.240.201.2])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 19F7BG-00055d-00
for 185530-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 12 May 2003 08:53:02 +0200
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by goggins.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 19F7BG-0003dP-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 08:53:02 +0200
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 19F7BG-0007ao-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 08:53:02 +0200
To: 185530-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: (fwd) tulip card works in current d-i.
X-Message-Flag: Message text blocked: ADULT LANGUAGE/SITUATIONS
Reply-By: Tue, 1 Jan 1801 04:37:40 +1000
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: 12 May 2003 08:53:01 +0200
Message-ID: <2flk7cwmzaq.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
Lines: 48
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <petter.reinholdtsen@usit.uio.no>
Delivered-To: 185530-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--=-=-=
This report claims the problem is fixed.
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
X-From-Line: mckinstry@computer.org Sun May 11 17:19:23 2003
Return-path: <mckinstry@computer.org>
Envelope-to: pre@usit.uio.no
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 May 2003 17:19:23 +0200
Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16])
by goggins.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7) id 19Esbj-0006MT-00
for pre@usit.uio.no; Sun, 11 May 2003 17:19:23 +0200
Received: from terror.hungry.com ([199.181.107.40])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #7) id 19Esbh-0007mh-00
for pre@usit.uio.no; Sun, 11 May 2003 17:19:22 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(forwarded by pere@hungry.com)
by terror.hungry.com with local; Sun, 11 May 2003 08:19:20 -0700
Delivered-To: pere@hungry.com
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [146.82.138.7])
(IDENT: mail)
by terror.hungry.com with esmtp; Sun, 11 May 2003 08:19:19 -0700
Received: from (coll.saorleir.com) [195.218.110.211]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19Esbe-0007EC-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 10:19:19 -0500
Received: by coll.saorleir.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 583D33BEBB; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:17:48 +0100 (IST)
Subject: tulip card works in current d-i.
From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
To: pere@debian.org
Organization:
Message-Id: <1052666268.1051.33.camel@coll>
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4
Date: 11 May 2003 16:17:48 +0100
Status: RO
X-Content-Length: 116
Xref: saruman.uio.no priv.list.debian.debian-boot:11030
Lines: 7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
The latest d-i with network hardware detect puts up a menu;
selecting tulip works, no problems.
Regards,
Alastair
--=-=-=
--
--=-=-=--
Reply to: