[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#166838: marked as done (general: outdated ext2 partition size limitations given in installation manual)



Your message dated 21 Dec 2002 15:46:41 -0600
with message-id <864r97dozi.fsf@gopher.onshored.com>
and subject line outdated ext2 partition size limitations given in installation manual
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2002 21:11:05 +0000
>From lwaldron@cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca Mon Oct 28 15:11:05 2002
Return-path: <lwaldron@cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca>
Received: from bureau6.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.16] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 186HA9-000517-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:11:05 -0600
Received: from cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca ([128.100.163.19] EHLO cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 1095]) by bureau6.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <241536-29293>; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:10:38 -0500
Received: from lwaldron by cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 186H9f-0000EH-00; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:10:35 -0500
From: Levi Waldron <lwaldron@cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: general: outdated ext2 partition size limitations given in installation manual
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:10:35 -0500
Message-Id: <E186H9f-0000EH-00@cedar.forestry.utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: general
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-28
Severity: important
Tags: patch

There is an outdated statement from the Debian installation guide - see

http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch-partitioning.en.html#s6.4

"Based on limitations in how ext2 works, avoid any single partition
greater than 6GB or so. "

This would be pretty annoying, and unnecessary, with a 120GB hard drive!


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cedar 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 166838-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Dec 2002 21:46:46 +0000
>From adam@onshored.com Sat Dec 21 15:46:45 2002
Return-path: <adam@onshored.com>
Received: from gopher.onshored.com [66.54.200.189] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18PrSH-00035S-00; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:46:45 -0600
Received: from gopher.onshored.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gopher.onshored.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CB6A19B
	for <166838-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:46:41 -0600 (CST)
Sender: adam@gopher.onshored.com
To: 166838-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: outdated ext2 partition size limitations given in installation manual
Organization: onShore Development, Inc
From: Adam DiCarlo <adam@onshored.com>
Date: 21 Dec 2002 15:46:41 -0600
Message-ID: <864r97dozi.fsf@gopher.onshored.com>
Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 166838-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.1 required=5.0
	tests=NOSPAM_INC,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
	      SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


> There is an outdated statement from the Debian installation guide -
> see
> 
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch-partitioning.en.html#s6.4
> 
> "Based on limitations in how ext2 works, avoid any single partition
> greater than 6GB or so. "
>
> This would be pretty annoying, and unnecessary, with a 120GB hard
> drive!

No, I stand by my statement.  The fsck time on ext2 disks seems to
scale at O(n^2) based on disk size so it's not a good idea to have
huge ext2 partitions.  I'll be a bit more explicit in the docs but
this is not a bug.

-- 
...Adam Di Carlo..<adam@onshore-devel.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>



Reply to: