Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?

To: andersen@codepoet.org
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: 02 Nov 2002 21:37:38 +0100
Message-id: <2fln0oru2r1.fsf@saruman.uio.no>
In-reply-to: <20021030205718.GA16679@codepoet.org>
References: <20021004153917.GA22536@valenciana> <20021004170231.GA312@valenciana> <20021029055308.GA20905@codepoet.org> <2fl1y69gn2p.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <20021030033017.GA4343@codepoet.org> <2flof9cfais.fsf@saruman.uio.no> <20021030205718.GA16679@codepoet.org>

[Erik Andersen]
> Useless 'reboot' binary?

Yes.  'reboot' do not reboot the machine.  It just returns to the
shell prompt without any error and nothing happens.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
  - From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>

Prev by Date: http://sixcool.diy.163.com/
Next by Date: cvs commit to debian-installer/tools/prebaseconfig/debian by pere
Previous by thread: http://sixcool.diy.163.com/
Next by thread: Re: [BusyBox] RFC: giving respawn init actions a controlling tty?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread