Re: [important] CVS-generated email shouldn't go here
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> > Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes:
> > > debian-boot-cvs, by analogy with debbugs and www?
> >
> > No -- again, debian-installer_cvs@packages.qa.debian.org. Managed by
> > the PTS system.
>
> So ... asking as a BTS admin, where should bug reports for the d-i
> packages be cc'ed? Also installer notifications. It seems strange for
> them to be cc'ed to anything other than
> debian-installer_cvs@packages.qa.debian.org in this case - after all,
> the PTS was in large part conceived as a way to get around the fact that
> the BTS doesn't have any other subscription mechanism (although it
> broadcasts katie's notifications too). In that case, we would have to
> start maintaining a source override for every d-i .udeb. But the bug
> reports should probably still go to debian-boot, so I'm now confused
> about how this fits into the way the PTS is used elsewhere.
Oh no, this last wouldn't be a concern, because the Maintainer: of the
d-i .udebs is debian-boot. So ignore that bit.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: