Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I think we're waiting for the problem to be fixed by the kernel > maintainer. We should use a patched 2.4.18 since it seems unlikely to > me that the archive maintainers will allow a new kernel (2.4.19) into > stable point releases. actually, i was asked to produce a 2.4.19bf kernel, which i have. if we need updated 2.4.18, i'll provide that. expect 2.4.18bf u/l by friday -john