Re: bogl forked (was Re: [patch] bogl memset_var for 32 bpp screen)
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:27:51PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
> > Sorry for not being clear - yes, I know that bterm has the same bug.
> > I'd appreciate it if someone on this list would look into using the
> > bogl and bterm in that package, so that we can scrap the one in
> > debian-boot CVS; having both makes me nervous about lost work.
>
> I guess we'll plan on using straight bogl from woody for the woody
> boot floppies. I hate forking. I'm not sure why we forked
> it... Maybe Marcin (or was it Marcel?) can explain it?
We didn't fork it for boot floppies; it was originally there. I added
new bogl packages to woody for debian-installer, though, a month ago.
At that point it was effectively forked - mostly my fault.
Dan
/--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\
| Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 |
| Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University |
| dan@debian.org | | dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu |
\--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
Reply to: