Bug#80325: AW: Bug#80325: Re: Bug#80325: how compact, vanilla and fdisk see the partition table

[Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>]

It seems that we have two interacting bugs, as far as I can
understand:

  libfdisk, and therefore dbootstrap, was ordering *BSD slices
  incorrectly with respect to extended partitions; they should be put
  *after* the extended partitons, but they weren't being

  the compact and idepci kernels don't have BSD disklabel support; all
  installation kernels need to be consistent (vanilla, udma66, idepci,
  compact)

I'm having a hard time to slog through all the messages and such, but
if anyone has some counter-evidence to my conclusion above, I'd like
to hear it.

Thanks to all you great bug testers for the the time.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>