Re: FALSE == 1

[Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>]

On Tue Oct 17, 2000 at 02:51:09PM +0100, Nick Holgate wrote:
> 
> I have just spent couple of hours tracking down a problem with a minor patch
> I made to the boot-floppies sources. It turns out that I made the assumption
> that the macro FALSE would be defined as 0, when in fact dbootstrap.h
> defines it as ((int) 1) and the corresponding TRUE definition as ((int) 0).
> I have not checked, but could other boot-floppies hackers have also made the
> same invalid assumption.

These came from busybox which has these for historical reasons.
We are in the process of changing these, but it is taking some
time.

dbootstrap should not have them included.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--