RFC: ITP(?) busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate packages

[zw@zhaoway.com]

Hi,

Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate
packages is a good idea or not. Thanks!

This comes to my mind because:

1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into woody (c.f. Adam)
2) Packages like mkinitrd-cd depends on boot-floppies solely for these two
utilities.

If it's a good idea ;-) I'd like to package 'em but I will need some further
help! ;-) I'm currently in NM queue, I suppose. ;-)

Best regards,

zhaoway