Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools
- To: era eriksson <era@iki.fi>, 69197@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#69197: base: Inadequate backup instructions and tools
- From: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 21:50:58 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000902215058.B21328@wire.cadcamlab.org>
- Reply-to: Peter Samuelson <peter@cadcamlab.org>, 69197@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <14758.6160.681250.415314@sirppi.helsinki.fi>; from era@iki.fi on Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 09:54:08AM +0300
- References: <200008151107.OAA14589@away.lingsoft.fi> <oalmxozo9a.fsf@arroz.fake> <14755.24479.904134.842397@sirppi.helsinki.fi> <oavgwsvy32.fsf@arroz.fake> <14755.59364.338434.215010@sirppi.helsinki.fi> <oaaee3wwto.fsf@arroz.fake> <14758.6160.681250.415314@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
[era eriksson]
> I get the impression from bugs.debian.org that only the receiving end
> can reclassify bugs.
Literally, there is no access control mechanism, so anyone can use the
control@ interface. As a matter of etiquette, I believe that, along
with the package maintainer, the bug submitter is "allowed" to
manipulate his own bugs -- useful for closing a bug that turns out to
be user error, or redirecting a bug when told it is for the wrong
package, etc.
Others should manipulate bugs only in special circumstances, or with
the permission of the maintainer. See http://www.debian.org/~branden/
for the best-known example of such permission.
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: