[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#69620: Is section 1.7 still required?
To
: Adam Di Carlo <
adam@onshore.com
>
Cc
:
69620@bugs.debian.org
, Colin Watson <
cjw44@flatline.org.uk
>
Subject
: Bug#69620: Is section 1.7 still required?
From
: Adam Di Carlo <
adam@onshore.com
>
Date
: 22 Aug 2000 23:02:11 -0400
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
oapun0y91o.fsf@arroz.fake
>
Reply-to
: Adam Di Carlo <
adam@onshore.com
>,
69620@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: Adam Di Carlo's message of "22 Aug 2000 22:04:00 -0400"
References
: <
[🔎]
E13QzKO-0007YR-00@localhost
> <
[🔎]
oa7l9820of.fsf@arroz.fake
>
Fixed the phrasing. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:
http://www.onShore.com/
>
Reply to:
debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Adam Di Carlo (on-list)
Adam Di Carlo (off-list)
References
:
Bug#69620: Is section 1.7 still required?
From:
Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Bug#69620: Is section 1.7 still required?
From:
Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Prev by Date:
Bug#69150: boot-floppies: provide more information about available disks for partitioning
Next by Date:
Bug#69154: marked as done (boot-floppies: simplify Debian mirror selection)
Previous by thread:
Bug#69620: Is section 1.7 still required?
Next by thread:
Processed: reassign Re: Bug#69617: there should be some statically linked tar at installtime
Index(es):
Date
Thread