Re: bugs 64500 and 64823
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Hello world,
>
> After installing b-f 2.2.16, 64500 and 64823 still seem to be
> open. Are these RC? Are they already fixed? Do they require a 2.2.17 be
> built? What's the deal?
Regarding 64500, there aren't a lot of powerpc/apus users, and the
ones our there seem incapable of identifying or fixing this problem.
I don't know what to say. Its either a busybox mount problem or a
2.2.10 apus kernel problem.
I think we can fix 64823 by change the dbootstrap lilo sanity code.
That would indeed require a 2.2.17.
If thats the only RC problem we have we're in damn good shape -- 64823
only affects users who need to put the bootloader code in a logical
partition, which is a pretty small minority of i386 users I imagine.
I don't think either should hold up potato release, IMHO.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: