Re: Boot-floppies: Why depends on "cslatex", "cspsfonts"
Sven LUTHER <luther@debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:07:24AM +0200 , Otto Wyss wrote:
> > > or suggests, if not removed at all?
> >
> > Probably recommends for the documentation "depends" should be enough, no?
Why? Documentation building properly is not considered important?
> > > How about all the other rather large list of packages?
> >
> > maybe tetex-*, but the others should stay
>
> Should language specific stuff, like plateform specific stuff right now, not
> be handled in the make depend part of the boot floppies, and not trully be
> dependencies ?
Why?
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: