Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)

To: Alvaro <alvaro@gbt.tfo.upm.es>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, joeyh@debian.org, gaia@iki.fi
Subject: Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)
From: bug1 <bug1@netconnect.com.au>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 12:54:10 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 396151D2.7D61F769@netconnect.com.au>
References: <[🔎] 200007030802.KAA21030@viracocha.gbt.tfo.upm.es>

Alvaro wrote:
> 
>         This assumption is false. The new installer is going to be modular, and
>         it will be able to start from a very small base (1 floppy, we hope) and
>         retrieve other modules as needed from various sources (like cd's,
>         floppies, and the network).
> 
> Where can I take a look at the new installer being developed, or is it just
> an idea yet?
> 
> Thanks, regards, Alvaro

Its just an idea at this stage,
http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/ has a guide to what may be.


Glenn

Reply to:

References:
- Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)
  - From: Alvaro <alvaro@gbt.tfo.upm.es>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.2.16 m68k build available for testing
Next by Date: Re: 2.2.16?
Previous by thread: Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)
Next by thread: Re: non-installable binaries in main (was Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread