Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.

To: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 16 May 2000 02:55:18 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oapuqnvvah.fsf@arroz.fake>
In-reply-to: Randolph Chung's message of "Mon, 15 May 2000 23:05:04 -0700"
References: <[🔎] 20000515224959.A10353@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 20000515230504.L17464@tausq.org>

There are definately a ton of modconf issues; I think we need a new
modconf as well.  I reported a bunch of stuff to Randolph on IRC,
using the idepci kernel (2.2.15pre20) and bf sources today from CVS.

-- 
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#64182: New installs should always use devpts by default
Next by Date: Re: HTTP corruption during install?
Previous by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Next by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread