Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.

To: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Cc: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>, dark@xs4all.nl, debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 23:05:04 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000515230504.L17464@tausq.org>
Reply-to: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000515224959.A10353@kitenet.net>; from joeyh@debian.org on Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:49:59PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 20000515224959.A10353@kitenet.net>

> We may need a new base-config, but I'm not sure. The only possibly RC
> bigfix in it is calling anXious -- Randolph, is that RC?

yes. the x config stuff seems to be a bit broken. needs to be tracked down
and fixed.

randolph
-- 
Debian Developer <tausq@debian.org>
http://www.TauSq.org/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>

References:
- Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#64182: New installs should always use devpts by default
Next by Date: Bug#64182: New installs should always use devpts by default
Previous by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Next by thread: Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread