Re: bootfloppies 2.2.11 report
I don't mean to say that people shouldn't use your experimental builds. If
anything, it's best to do them so we catch all the problems before a real
release... :) Just want to make that clear....
> Quite possibly. Can you be more specific? I always refresh from
> http.us.debian.org just before building. I don't use any pcmcia devices
> here, so I'd be oblivious to faults with them.
You may not be using the correct combination of kernel/pcmcia modules. Make
sure that if you are using a -3 kernel, you have a k3 pcmcia module package.
> I'll probably not be updating my builds very often now, as my pool
> of guinea pigs is drying up. How should I name my unofficial builds?
> Something like 2.2.11-cvs-20000411?
up to you really. in the past i've used pre2.2.11-20000411
Debian Developer <firstname.lastname@example.org>