[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#55474: marked as done (Can't install: post inst script crashes)



Your message dated Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:58:32 -0800
with message-id <20000206135832.G25437@kitenet.net>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2000 18:14:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 19673 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2000 18:14:46 -0000
Received: from stmp2.superonline.com (HELO smtpin.superonline.com) (212.252.115.7)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2000 18:14:46 -0000
Received: from mailsrv.superonline.com (mail.superonline.com [212.252.115.2])
	by smtpin.superonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27703
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:16:56 +0200 (EET)
Received: from localhost ([212.252.29.205]) by mailsrv.superonline.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 635-62499U200000L200000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:18:16 +0200
Received: from exa by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 12AGmJ-0001BC-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:21:23 +0200
From: exa <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Can't install: post inst script crashes
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.48
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.48
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:21:23 +0200
Message-Id: <E12AGmJ-0001BC-00@localhost>

Package: base-config
Version: 0.07
Severity: important

I'm reporting verbose:

------

orion:exa$ sudo dpkg --install
/var/cache/apt/archives/base-config_0.07_i386.deb 
(Reading database ... 116117 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace base-config 0.07 (using .../base-config_0.07_i386.deb)
...
Unpacking replacement base-config ...
Setting up base-config (0.07) ...
dpkg: error processing base-config (--install):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 base-config
  
-------

the same thing had happened the first time i tried to install the package
using apt, too.


-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux orion 2.2.13 #1 Wed Jan 12 08:03:57 EET 2000 i686

Versions of packages base-config depends on:
ii  apt                           0.3.16     Advanced front-end for dpkg       
ii  debconf                       0.2.76     Debian configuration management sy

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 55216-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2000 21:58:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 27802 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2000 21:58:36 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-193-116-241.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO kitenet.net) (qmailr@63.193.116.241)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 6 Feb 2000 21:58:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 11035 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2000 21:58:32 -0000
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:58:32 -0800
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
To: 55216-done@bugs.debian.org, 55297-done@bugs.debian.org,
  55547-done@bugs.debian.org, 55719-done@bugs.debian.org,
  55474-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <20000206135832.G25437@kitenet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i

I am closing these bugs because:

- the problem cannot be reproduced.
- the bug submitter cannot be contacted (for 2+ weeks).
- the bug submitter was filing the exact same bug report every day over and
  over, the fact that he has stopped leads me to think whatever the bug was
  has been fixed; in light of the lack of any other information to go on.

-- 
see shy jo


Reply to: